Responsabiliser les utilisateurs finaux dans le développement d’ontologies terminologiques pour promouvoir des solutions numériques durables
Mots-clés :
approche centrée sur l’utilisateur, terminologie spécifique à un certain domaine, ontologies terminologiques, affichages double modeRésumé
L’article explore une approche innovante pour développer des ontologies terminologiques en impliquant activement les utilisateurs finaux. L’étude décrit la méthodologie de cette approche inclusive centrée sur l’utilisateur, présente les résultats d’une étude pilote et en discute les implications pour la promotion de cultures axée sur les données et de solutions numériques durables. Les ontologies terminologiques ainsi développées peuvent servir de couche sémantique pour un catalogue de données. Dans l’étude pilote présentée, les participants ont reçu une séquence de trois tâches simples menées dans un cadre expérimental contrôlé (non invasif), qui consistaient à découvrir des conceptualisations dans une négociation d’affaires naturelle. L’étude pilote montre qu’en peu de temps, il est possible pour les participants de produire une terminologie pertinente et spécifique à un domaine donné, ce qui peut permettre de commencer la rédaction ultérieure d’une ontologie terminologique. En outre, des visualisations plus efficaces des ontologies terminologiques – des affichages double mode combinant des formats textuels et graphiques – peuvent permettre aux utilisateurs finaux à la fois d’étendre les ontologies et d’en assurer la qualité.
Références
Chongtay, R., Last, M., Verbeke, M., & Berendt, B. (2013). Summarize to learn: summarization and visualization of text for ubiquitous learning. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Workshop on Interactive Visual Text Analytics at VIS 2013, The 3rd IEEE Workshop on Interactive Visual Text Analytics, Atlanta, GA (pp. 1-4).
Bork, D., David, I., España, S., Guizzardi, G., Proper, H. A., & Reinhartz-Berger, I. (2024). The role of modeling in the analysis and design of sustainable systems: A Panel Report. Communications of the Association for Information Systems (CAIS). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379035620_The_Role_of_Modeling_in_the_Analysis_and_Design_of_Sustainable_Systems_A_Panel_Report
Bowker, L. (2022). Multidimensionality. In P. Faber & M.-C. L’Homme (Eds.), Theoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge (Chapter 6). John Benjamins Publishing. https://benjamins.com/catalog/tlrp.23.06bow
Cabré, M. T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, Methods, and Applications. John Benjamins Publishing. https://benjamins.com/catalog/tlrp.1
Cabré, M. T. (2003). Theories of terminology: Their description, prescription and explanation. Terminology, 9(2), 163-199. https://doi.org/10.1075/term.9.2.03cab
Christensen, L. L. W., & Madsen, B. N. (2023). Terminology as a Strategic Support Tool in Crisis Situations such as the COVID-19 Pandemic. Terminology science and research - Journal of the International Institute of Terminology Research, 26, 1-23. https://journal-eaft-aet.net/index.php/tsr/article/view/3467
De Nicola, A., & Missikoff, M. (2016). A Lightweight Methodology for Rapid Ontology Engineering. Commununications of the ACM. 59, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818359
Ehrlinger, L., Schrott, J., Melichar, M., Kirchmayr, N., & Wöß, W. (2021). Data catalogs: a systematic literature review and guidelines to implementation. In Database and Expert Systems Applications-DEXA 2021 Workshops: BIOKDD, IWCFS, MLKgraphs, AI-CARES, ProTime, AISys 2021, Virtual Event, September 27–30, 2021, Proceedings 32 (pp. 148-158). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-87101-7_15
Esposito, A., Calvano, M., Curci, A., Desolda, G., Lanzilotti, R., Lorusso, C., & Piccinno, A. (2023, May). End-User Development for Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Literature Review. In International Symposium on End User Development, 19-34. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34433-6_2
Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition, 5(2), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008
ISO/IEC 11179-4:2004 Information technology Metadata registries (MDR) Part 4: Formulation of data definitions.
ISO (2019). Terminology Work - Vocabulary. Part 1: Theory and application (1087-1). Geneva.
ISO (2022). Terminology work - Principles and methods (704). Geneva.
Hjorland, B. & Gnoli, C. (2022). ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization. https://www.isko.org/cyclo/terminology
Kremser, W., & Brunauer, R. (2019). Do we have a Data Culture?. In Data Science–Analytics and Applications: Proceedings of the 2nd International Data Science Conference–iDSC2019 (pp. 83-87). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-658-27495-5_11
Madsen, B. N., & Thomsen, H. E. (2009). Terminological concept modelling and conceptual data modelling. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 4(4), 239-249. https://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.029228
Madsen, B. N., Thomsen, H. E., Halskov, J. & Lassen, T. (2010). Automatic Ontology Construction for a National Term Bank. In Terminology and Knowledge Engineering Conference 2010, pp. 502-533. https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/58916334/TKE_2010_HET_BNM_JH_TL.pdf
Munappy, A. R., Bosch, J. & Olsson, H. H. (2020). Data pipeline management in practice: Challenges and opportunities. In Product-Focused Software Process Improvement: 21st International Conference, PROFES 2020, Turin, Italy, November 25–27, 2020, Proceedings 21 (pp. 168-184). Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/ 10.1007/978-3-030-64148-1_11
Nielsen, L. P. (2015). Knowledge Dissemination Based on Terminological Ontologies: Using Eye Tracking to Further User Interface Design. Copenhagen Business School [Phd]. https://research.cbs.dk/en/publications/knowledge-dissemination-based-on-terminological-ontologies-using-
Nielsen, L. P. (2016). Target Users’ Diagrammatic Reasoning of Domain-Specific Terminology. TERM BASES AND LINGUISTIC LINKED OPEN DATA, 224. https://research.cbs.dk/da/publications/target-users-diagrammatic-reasoning-of-domain-specific-terminolog
Nilsson, H. (2023): Begrepp om begrepp. Article published on The Swedish Association for Terminology (Terminologifrämjandet in Swedish). https://terminologiframjandet.se/h552a9FtZ/2023/10/27/begrepp-om-begrepp/
Sanctorum, A., Riggio, J., Maushagen, J., Sepehri, S., Arnesdotter, E., Delagrange, M., De Kock, J., Vanhaecke, T., Debruyne, C., & De Troyer, O. (2022). End-user engineering of ontology-based knowledge bases. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(9), 1811-1829. https://researchportal.vub.be/en/publications/end-user-engineering-of-ontology-based-knowledge-bases
Seiner, R. S. (2014). Non-Invasive Data Governance: The Path of Least Resistance and Greatest Success. Technics Publications
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Louise Pram Nielsen 2024
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
TSR is committed to Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence (CC BY-NC). This licence permits users to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article provided that the author is attributed as the original creator and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes i.e. research or educational use. The author has the copyright but TSR has the right of first publication. When the article is used e.g. for educational or other non-commercial purposes, the user is expected to mention the author(s), the title of the publication, the name and the number of the publication series and URL-address. The license of the published metadata is Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0).
