Des concepts nomades en latin médiéval ? L’exemple de FIGURA
Keywords:
Medieval Latin, lexicography, nomadic concepts, FIGURAAbstract
The author examines the application of the concept of "nomadic concepts" to Medieval Latin by analyzing the key terms Figura (figure), Spiritus (spirit), and Fructus (fruit). Drawing on lexicographical evidence from major Latin dictionaries (TLL, MLW, DML), the research traces semantic evolution from Antiquity through the medieval period. The analysis reveals that although Medieval Latin lexicographers routinely employ metaphorical, metonymical, and analogical approaches in their work, the systematic identification of conceptual nomadism proves challenging due to inconsistent domain categorization. The study demonstrates that Figura shows limited migration to new domains (natural history, law) while maintaining extensive usage across established fields (grammar, rhetoric, theology). Nevertheless, conclusive evidence of systematic conceptual nomadism toward the sciences remains elusive in the examined corpus.
References
Alexandre, R., Bon, B., & Guerreau-Jalabert, A. (2013). Variations graphiques, variations morphologiques et lemmatisation du latin médiéval. In J. Elfassi, C. Lanéry, & A.-M. Turcan-Verkerk (Éds.), « Amicorum societas » : Mélanges offerts à François Dolbeau pour son 65e anniversaire (p. 3-18). Sismel.
Andler, D., & Stengers, I. (Éds.). (1987). D’une science à l’autre : Des concepts nomades. Éd. du Seuil.
Blaise, A. (1954). Dictionnaire latin-français des auteurs chrétiens. Brepols.
Blatt, F., Lefèvre, Y., Monfrin, J., Dolbeau, F., & Guerreau-Jalabert, A. (Éds.). (1957). Novum Glossarium Mediae Latinitatis : Ab anno DCCC usque ad annum MCC. Munksgaard, Union Académique Internationale.
Bon, B. (2013). Le vocabulaire technique en latin médiéval, entre mythe et réalité. Archivum Latinitatis Medii Aevi, 71, 355-375. https://doi.org/10.3406/alma.2013.1278
Bon, B., & Guerreau-Jalabert, A. (2002). Pietas : Réflexions sur l’analyse sémantique et le traitement lexicographique d’un vocable médiéval. Médiévales, 42, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.3406/medi.2002.1540
Christin, O. (Éd.). (2010). Dictionnaire des concepts nomades en sciences humaines. Éditions Métailié.
Christin, O., & Deschamp, M. (Éds.). (2016). Dictionnaire des concepts nomades en sciences humaines. Tome 2. Éditions Métailié.
Christin, O., & Deschamp, M. (2019). Critique de la langue politique : Les concepts nomades et l’histoire des idées. Le Bord de l’eau.
Du Cange, C. D. F. (1937). Glossarium mediae et infimae latinitatis (P. Carpentier, L. Henschel, & L. Favre, Éds.; Editio nova aucta, Vols. 1-10). Librairie des sciences et des arts.
Forcellini, E. (1839). Totius latinitatis lexicon, concilio et cura Jacobi Facciolati, opera et studio Aegidii Forcellini,... Lucubratum a Josepho Furlanetto,... Auctum et emendatum (Vols. 1-4). Fratr. Giachetti.
Gaffiot, F. (avec Flobert, P.). (2001). Dictionnaire latin-français (Nouv. éd.). Hachette.
Latham, R. E., Howlett, D. R., & Ashdowne, R. (Éds.). (1975). Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British sources. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Prinz, O., Lehmann, P., & Stroux, J. (Éds.). (1959). Mittellateinisches Wörterbuch : Bis zum ausgehenden 13. Jahrhundert. C. H. Beck.
Thesaurus linguae latinae, Vol. VI 1 : F-Gemo. (1987). B. G. Teubner.
Trésor de la Langue Française : Dictionnaire de la langue du XIXe et du XXe siècle, 1789-1960. (1971). Éd. du CNRS [puis] Gallimard.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bruno Bon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
TSR is committed to Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence (CC BY-NC). This licence permits users to use, reproduce, disseminate or display the article provided that the author is attributed as the original creator and that the reuse is restricted to non-commercial purposes i.e. research or educational use. The author has the copyright but TSR has the right of first publication. When the article is used e.g. for educational or other non-commercial purposes, the user is expected to mention the author(s), the title of the publication, the name and the number of the publication series and URL-address. The license of the published metadata is Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0).